November 05, 2019
Comprising over 1,200 artworks, the Ambassador Dato’ N. Parameswaran Collection is one of the largest of its kind outside of Vietnam and its depth and diversity create innumerable lines of inquiry. Through three prior exhibitions NUS Museum has explored the works as a form of documentation of the Vietnamese response to the war (Vietnam 1954-1975), the use of drawing as a medium and how it was used to capture physical nature of life around the battlefields (LINES) and how art was employed in an effort to move beyond the war period by building a new narrative (“Who Wants To Remember A War?”).
In NUS Museum’s fourth and final exhibition drawn from the collection, focus is shifted once again. Wartime Artists of Vietnam specifically engages with concept of an artist’s agency; how they are pulled in multiple directions as war artists and how they reflect the war experience through art.
To mark the opening of this exhibition, we put some of our most pressing questions to the curator, Sung Yunwen.
What unites the artists who are presented in this exhibition?
Many of the Vietnamese artists joined the military and became guerrilla artists in the country’s two resistance wars, for in them throbbed both the patriotic sentiment and the creative impulse. Under extreme conditions of conflict, they negotiated between their dual identities—as both soldier and artist— and mediated between official dictates and their exercise of individual agency.
Some of their works were primarily made to boost morale and honour the people’s struggle during the war, while others were created by the artists’ personal initiatives to depict various facets of everyday activities and portray human relationships in wartime with telling and acute renderings.
These artist-soldiers were by no means passive “cultural manufacturers”. Rather, through their wartime creations, not only did they articulate their individual and collective experiences of war—hence using art as a vehicle for storytelling—but also strove to maintain a sense of creative continuity with their former art training and backgrounds. To fully grasp how these artists managed their obligations and convictions, it is necessary to take both an artistic and biographical approach to examine the ways they modified and mediated their art practices.